THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECTTOMORPH SKELETAL SHAPE AND INCIDENCE OF ANGLE MALOCCLUSION TO 16 YEARS OLD STUDENTS AT SMAN 4 PADANG
Abstract
Malocclusion is a deviation of normal occlusion in the growth process of the teeth caused by certain factors. Angle malocclusion is one of the existing malocclusion classifications by looking at the shape of the first molar relationship. One of the causes of malocclusion is the lack of nutrition. Adequate nutrition canbe seen from the shape of a person's skeletal, according to Sheldon classification it is divided into three, namely, ectomorph (skinny), mesomorphk (normal) and endomorph (fat). This study was conducted to determine the relationship between ectomorph skeletal shape and the incidence of Angle malocclusion to SMA Negeri 4 Padang students. The study was conducted with comparative cross-sectional design. The samples were divided into two groups: the ectomorph skeletal shape (thin) and mesomorph skeletal shape (normal), the number of respondents respectively 28. Group of skeletal shape was determined by using BMI (Body Mass Index) and direct malocclusion examination in the respondents’mouth using mouth glass by looking at the
respondent first molar relationship in accordance with the concept of Angle malocclusion classification. Of the results on ectomorph and mesomorph respondents with the incidence of malocclusion, it is not found a significant relationship with the use of chi-square analysis (p>0.05). Conclusion of the study show that there is no relationship between ectomorph skeletal shape and Angle malocclusion. Ectomorph and mesomorph skeletal shape and do not have significant differences.
Key words :malocclusion, BMI, skeletal shape
References
2. Amerian Academy Od Pediatric Dentistry.Guideline on Management of The Developing Dentition and Occlusion in Pediatric Dentistry.Reference Manual V36 2014;No:6;14:
3. Thomaz EBAF, Cangussu MCT, da Silva AAM, Assis AMO. Is malnutrition associated with crowding in permanent dentition?. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010;(8):3531-41.
4. Almonaitiene R, Balciuniene I, Tulkaviene J. Factors influencingpermanent tooth eruption. Stomatologija Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal 2010;(12):67-72.
5. Khan N. Eruption Time of Permanent Teeth in Pakistani Children. Iranian J 1. Publ Health 2011:Sept(40):63-73
6. Kutesa A. Et al. Weight, Height and Eruption Times Of Permanent Teeth Of Children Age 4-15 Years in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Oral Health 2013; 13:15
7. Moshkelgosha V, Khosravifard N, Golkari A. Toot Eruption Sequence and dental crowding: a case-control. F1000Research 2014;3:122
8. Pambudi Raharjo. Buku Diagnosis Ortodontik.Surabaya: Pusat Penerbitan dan Pencetakan Unair (AUP); 2008
9. I Dewa Nyoman Supariasa. Et al. Penilaian Status Gizi: Jakarta : EGC; 2001
10. Ahmad Djunaid. Et al. Gambaran Pengetahuan Tentang Tampilan Maloklusi pada Siswa Sekolah Menegah Pertama Kristen 67 Imanuel Bahu. Jurnal e-GiGi (eG); 2013 1(1) : 28-31
11. Hamish Thomson. Buku Oklusi edisi 2.Jakarta : EGC; 2007
12. Altriany Sasea. et al. Gambaran Status Kebersihan Rongga Mulut dan Status Gingiva pada Mahasiswa dengan Gigi Berjejal. Jurnal e-GiGi (eG); 2013 1(1) :52-58
13. Bryan Satria Prima. Hubungan Antara Bentuk Skeletal Ektomorfik dan Mesomorfik Dengan Panjang Lengkung Gigi Posterior Pada Laki- Laki Usia 16-20 Tahun Untuk Menunjng Diagnosa dan Rencana Perawatan Ortodonsia. Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Univ. Jember; 2012
14. Sonia Febri Andinisari. Hubungan Bentuk Skeletal Ektomorfik Dengan Lebar Lengkung Alveolar Intermolar Pada Anak Usia 16 Tahun. Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Univ. Jember; 2011
15. Heasman P. Master dentistry restorative dentistry, pediatric dentistry, and orthodontics .Churchill Livingstone; 2004. Vol 2 p. 227-52.
16. Timmreck, Thomas C. Epidemiologi: Suatu Pengantar Ed. 2. Jakarta : EGC; 2004
17. Dr. Arisman, MB. Buku Ujar Ilmu Gizi: Gizi Dalam Dair Kehidupan Cet.3. Jakarta : EGC; 2004
18. Pambudi Raharjo. Buku Ortodonti Dasar. Surabaya: Pusat Penerbitan dan Pencetakan Unair (AUP); 2009
19. Eriska Riyanti. et al.Maloklusi Pada Anak Akibat Tidak Mendapatkan ASI. Universitas Padjajaran: Bandung ; 2010
20. T.D. Foster. Buku Ajar Ortodonti: Jakarta : EGC; 2012
21. Marry E. Beck. Buku Ilmu Gizi dan Diet: Yogyakarta : Yayasan Essentia Medica (YEM) : 2011
22. Mokhtar M. Dasar-dasar ortodonti pertumbuhan dan perkembangan kraniodentofasial. Medan: Bina Insani Pustaka; 2002, p. 1-2
23. Desi FK, Sylvia M, Kristiani S. Hubungan lebar mesio distal gigi insisif dengan lengkung geligi pada kasus bedesakan anterior. Jurnal PDGI 2007;57(2): 52-5
24. Proffit WR, Fields HW, David MS. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4rd ed. St Lois Mosby; 2007
25. Graber, Vanarsdall, VIG. Orthodontics Current Principles and Techniques. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby : 2012
26. Bishara SE. Textbook of Orthodontics. Chicago WB. Saunders Company : 2001.p.95
27. Arnold Kyoto. Gambaran Maloklusi Pada Siswa-Siswi SDK 6 BPK Penabur Kelompok Umur 11-12 Tahun Berdasarkan Klasifikasi Angle dan Proffit-Ackerman. Universitas Kristen Maranatha: Bandung; 2011
